Karl Popper and Falsifiability Essay -- Science Scientific Karl Popper

Karl Popper and FalsifiabilityKarl Poppers claim that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability is a clearly viable statement. This is a natural extension of his idea about how scientific friendship is increased (Edwards, 1967). In an cause to define science from pseudo-science, Popper states that the growth of scientific knowledge begins with an imaginative intent of hypotheses (Edwards, 1967). Then, the scientist must search for illustrations or situations that falsify or negate the hypothesis. Finally, subsequently rigorous attempts have been made to find the hypothesis untrue, the scientist may tentatively accept the hypothesis as true. However, if the hypothesis is found untrue, the scientist must avert his hypothesis . Therefore, Popper has set forth not only a explanation of a scientific theory, but also an environment wherein scientists can work. Popper is sharp in his definition of an imaginative hypothesis. Popper intends that a hypoth esis must prefigure a phenomenon or behavior and not just offer to exempt it. Traditionally, scientists have formed hypotheses in an attempt to explain or prune some natural phenonmen that they have examined. That is, hypotheses are presented as justification for an observation. The two-sphere deterrent example of the universe that existed in pre-Copernican times is an excellent example of this method. The ancients needed a model with which to justify the constantly changing positions of the moon and planets. Instead of macrocosm based on subjective observations, a hypothesis should be the furbish up product of a scientists imagination. Popper calls this an irrational element or a inventive intuition (Williams, 1989). Sir Isaac Newton is an excellent exam... ... scientific community learns from the experience and knowledge becomes a cumulative project. Popper does a great service to the scientific community by stating and refining the obvious way science has worked for cent uries. Referencesa. Edwards, Paul, Editor-in-Chief. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volumes 5 and 6. (1967), pp 398-401. b. Gillespie, Charles C. Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Volumes I, X, and XI. (1975), pp 250-258, 186- 202, 401, 410. c. Klemke, E. D. , et al. Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science. (1988), pp 19-27. d. OHear, Anthony. Karl Popper. (1989), pp 96-111.e. Westfall, Richard. Never at Rest A Biography of Isaac Newton. (1980), pp 170-181. f. Who s Who in Science. (1967), pp 1257, 1381, 61.g, Williams, Douglas E. Truth, Hope, and Power The horizon of Karl Popper. (1989), pp 61-73.