The British and American shipway of counting things grew apart in the time in declare the American Revolution. Be understanding America was separated from Britain, and be establish the Americans were non goerned stringently by Britain for umpteen years, their interpretations of m some(prenominal) backchats were rattling disparate. This inconsistency became supposable in the years abounding before the Revolution as Britain tried to tighten their hold everyplace the colonies. The most most-valuable dissimilitudes in interpretations were those for the records representation, reign, formation, and closeness.         The marrow of the member representation was vastly unalike for the Americans than for the British. The British believed in a policy of virtual(prenominal) representation. This meant that those eliteed into fantan correspond the interests of the compositional pudding stone. Therefore, since everyone in sevens represented all split of the Empire, disparate parts of the Empire did non engage to guide their let set in Parliament. come on more than, most side of meat subjects did non take both more check come out in organisation than the colonies since attached parts of England did non tie down out as galore(postnominal) a nonher(prenominal)(prenominal) quite a lesser in Parliament as other parts. The colonialists did not language this form of virtual representation. They took a more practical encounter in point. They disputeed that they should allow a certain number of seats in Parliament unmannerly for the colonies to elect representatives. They purpose procedure that throng should ask a say in the authorities body that look intos them. This force wind, held by Americans, came from the beginning of the colonies, where members of the colonial host had represented the hatful from the country area that they were from, and had won their office. This divergence in picture was do evident when Britain imposed evaluatees on the Americans. The Americans did not conceive of that they should profits taxes if they had no say in the governing that taxed them. The slogan, No tax income without representation, is an congresswoman of this adopt point. Because they did not think that these taxes were fair, the colonialists protested in many heterogeneous ways. These protests lead to punitive police forces like the Intolerable spells, which light-emitting diode to more protests in a cycle which ultimately resulted in the basal War.         other major distinction in the British and American meanings of the same book of account is that of the word establishmental. The American earn of the character was a record that spelled out the force-outs of the brass. This view was held by Americans because their colonial governments were based on charters. The Americans thought that if a integrity was unconstitutional, it held no force, and need not be obeyed. An early warning of this view occurred in 1761. mob Otis argued that the writs of assistance (search warrants) were unconstitutional, and accordingly void. Another typeface was the response to the Stamp good turn. The colonialists ignored the law because they thought it was unfair or unconstitutional for the colonies to digest taxes when they had no say in the government. As far as capacious Britain was concerned, the constitution was the laws and institutions followed by the rural area that had developed and changed over time. England would not contend that a law passed by Britain did not hold out because it was unconstitutional. They energy rebel against the government that passed the law, tho they would not make out the legitimacy of it. The colonists ignoring laws they deemed unconstitutional kindle the British government, which lead to actions that caused the war. resembling the difference of interpretation of the word representation, the difference of interpretation of the word constitution was a cause of the American Revolution.         There was another difference in opinion over the meaning of independentty. position raft did not view sovereignty as something that could be divided. The sovereignty had rested in Parliament since the Glorious Revolution. incline did not think that the spot of a nation could be in different places. The English didnt deny that the colonial governments had passed laws, but they thought that those laws were secondary to Parliaments laws. The colonists did not hold this opinion. Their colonial government had elevate much of the government power and responsibility since the colonies were founded. The colonialists did not think of Parliament as having all power. They thought that the people should have the power to elect those that governed them, and this was not how Parliament worked.
Eventually, the colonists rejected Parliaments right to tax them by protesting the Stamp Act, the lollipop Act, and the Townshend Act. An example of this view was when Patrick Henry claimed that lonesome(prenominal) the House of Burgesses had the right to tax Virginians. The British view that Parliament was sovereign was made plain in America with the declarative Act where Parliament claimed to have the power to enact any law on the colonies. The difference in opinion on this matter was a major cause of the revolution because the colonists refusal to have got Parliament as sovereign was the cogitate that they fought the taxes and other acts that the colonial governments didnt pass.         The last word that the British and Americans had vary interpretations of was liberty. The British had a vague view of liberty. They did not have certain liberties spelled out. The colonialist had croak used to having freedoms because Great Britain did not exercise much falsify over them. When Britain started to change its polices in 1763, the liberties that the colonists had enjoyed were in some cases, interpreted away. This was evident in the colonists protests to the Sugar Act which took away their rights to ravel by jury, and the protests to the taxes, because they thought they should have the liberty to only pay taxes to governments to which they had representation. The colonialists also protested the Quartering Act because it was thought to be a violation of rights to force people to ply and lodge soldiers. The different ideas of what liberty meant lead to Britain issue laws that confine their liberty. These laws lead to the war.         The magnetic variation in the British and American views on certain concepts had changed over years of separation. These divergences were made apparent when Britain determined that they had to tighten their control on the colonies. Their views on liberty, sovereignty, representation, and constitution had become very different; so different, they helped lead to the revolution.         If you necessitate to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.